How mature is your Data & AI organization?Take the diagnostic
All trainings

AI TRAINING

Clinical AI & Medical Device Regulation

Master EU MDR and FDA SaMD frameworks to bring AI-driven medical devices to market compliantly.

Format
programme
Duration
24–40h
Level
advanced
Group size
4–16
Price / participant
€4K–€7K
Group price
€18K–€45K
Audience
Regulatory affairs managers, medical device R&D leads, quality assurance engineers, and clinical evidence specialists working on AI/ML-based medical software
Prerequisites
Working knowledge of medical device development or regulatory affairs; familiarity with basic software development lifecycle concepts; no prior AI expertise required but beneficial

What it covers

This practitioner-level programme equips regulatory affairs professionals and medical device teams with a comprehensive understanding of the EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR 2017/745), FDA Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) pathways, and IEC 62304 software lifecycle requirements as applied to AI/ML systems. Participants will work through real device classification exercises, quality management system (QMS) adaptation for ML models, and post-market surveillance planning for continuously learning algorithms. Delivery combines live expert-led sessions with structured case studies drawn from cleared and CE-marked AI devices, and culminates in a draft regulatory strategy document participants can apply immediately.

What you'll be able to do

  • Classify an AI/ML-based software product under EU MDR and determine the correct conformity assessment route, including Notified Body involvement
  • Draft a Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) aligned with FDA guidance for a continuously learning SaMD product
  • Identify and document the gaps between an existing ISO 13485 QMS and the additional requirements imposed by AI/ML model management
  • Design a post-market surveillance and clinical follow-up plan that accounts for model drift and algorithm updates
  • Map dual-regulation obligations where both the EU AI Act and MDR apply to the same product, identifying which authority takes precedence

Topics covered

  • EU MDR 2017/745: classification rules and conformity assessment routes for AI-based devices
  • FDA SaMD pathway: 510(k), De Novo, PMA, and the Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP)
  • IEC 62304 software lifecycle applied to ML model training, validation, and retraining
  • AI Act intersection with MDR: dual-regulation obligations for high-risk AI systems
  • Clinical evaluation and PMCF planning for adaptive algorithms
  • Post-market surveillance and vigilance reporting for ML-based devices
  • Quality Management System (ISO 13485) adaptations for data-driven products
  • Change management and version control strategies for continuously learning models

Delivery

Delivered as a blended programme over 4–6 weeks: approximately 50% live virtual instructor-led sessions (half-day blocks) and 50% asynchronous case study work and reading. In-person intensives can be arranged for groups of 8 or more. Each module includes annotated regulatory document templates (technical file sections, PMCF plans, PCCP templates). A dedicated Q&A clinic with a regulatory consultant is included in the final week. All materials are updated annually to reflect evolving MDCG guidance and FDA Digital Health Center of Excellence publications.

What makes it work

  • Involve regulatory affairs, clinical, and ML engineering teams jointly in training to ensure shared vocabulary and aligned responsibility for compliance artefacts
  • Apply learning immediately by working on a live or recent internal device project during case study sessions rather than hypothetical scenarios
  • Establish internal change control procedures for model retraining before the product enters post-market phase, not after the first model update is needed
  • Assign a designated regulatory owner for AI/ML product lines who maintains ongoing awareness of MDCG guidance updates and FDA Digital Health publications

Common mistakes

  • Treating an AI/ML system as purely software and neglecting device classification rules, leading to incorrect conformity assessment routes and costly rework late in development
  • Failing to define model change thresholds in advance, resulting in every algorithm update triggering a full re-submission rather than being covered by a PCCP or equivalent
  • Underestimating post-market surveillance obligations for adaptive algorithms, particularly the need for real-world performance monitoring beyond traditional adverse event reporting
  • Assuming CE marking under MDR automatically satisfies FDA SaMD requirements, and vice versa, without conducting a gap analysis between the two frameworks

When NOT to take this

This programme is not appropriate for early-stage startups that have not yet defined their device indication or intended use — they need a product-market fit and basic regulatory scoping engagement first, not a detailed conformity assessment deep-dive.

Providers to consider

Sources

This training is part of a Data & AI catalog built for leaders serious about execution. Take the free diagnostic to see which trainings your team needs.