How mature is your Data & AI organization?Take the diagnostic
All trainings

AI TRAINING

Multimodal AI Engineering for Product Teams

Build production systems that combine vision, text, and audio using state-of-the-art multimodal LLMs.

Format
bootcamp
Duration
24–40h
Level
practitioner
Group size
6–16
Price / participant
€2K–€4K
Group price
€18K–€45K
Audience
Software engineers, ML engineers, and technical product managers building AI-powered features
Prerequisites
Comfortable with Python, REST APIs, and basic LLM prompting; prior experience with at least one LLM API (OpenAI, Anthropic, or similar)

What it covers

This practitioner-level programme equips engineers and product teams with the skills to design, build, and deploy multimodal AI systems that integrate vision, text, and audio inputs. Participants work hands-on with leading multimodal models—including GPT-4o, Claude Vision, and Gemini—and learn how to select the right architecture for real-world use cases such as document intelligence, visual Q&A, and audio transcription pipelines. The course covers prompt engineering for multimodal inputs, grounding techniques, output parsing, and evaluation strategies specific to non-text modalities. Format combines live coding sessions, guided labs, and architecture review workshops.

What you'll be able to do

  • Send structured multimodal prompts (image + text) to GPT-4o, Claude Vision, and Gemini and parse their outputs reliably in production code
  • Design an end-to-end document intelligence pipeline combining OCR, layout detection, and visual Q&A
  • Build an audio processing workflow that transcribes, diarises, and routes spoken input to downstream actions
  • Select the appropriate multimodal model and architecture for a given cost, latency, and accuracy constraint
  • Evaluate multimodal system quality using task-specific metrics beyond simple accuracy

Topics covered

  • Architecture of multimodal LLMs: how vision, text and audio encoders are unified
  • Hands-on with GPT-4o, Claude Vision, and Gemini multimodal APIs
  • Prompt engineering and grounding for image and audio inputs
  • Document intelligence: OCR, layout parsing, and visual Q&A
  • Audio pipelines: transcription, speaker diarisation, and speech-to-action
  • Evaluation and benchmarking of multimodal outputs
  • Cost, latency, and reliability trade-offs across providers
  • Production patterns: batching, caching, and error handling for multimodal workloads

Delivery

Delivered over 3-5 days, either in-person or fully remote via video conference with shared cloud lab environments. Each module is approximately 60% hands-on coding and 40% instructor-led explanation and architecture discussion. Participants receive access to a shared GPU-enabled cloud workspace pre-loaded with API keys and starter notebooks. A private Slack or Teams channel is maintained for async support during and after the bootcamp. In-person delivery is available in major European cities; remote cohorts are capped at 16 participants to preserve interactivity.

What makes it work

  • Start with a single, well-scoped multimodal use case (e.g., invoice extraction) before generalising the architecture
  • Build a dedicated evaluation dataset with labelled multimodal examples before going to production
  • Assign an engineer with API integration experience as the internal champion to maintain provider SDK updates
  • Instrument cost and token usage per modality from day one to avoid bill shock at scale

Common mistakes

  • Treating multimodal prompting identically to text prompting — image and audio tokens have different cost structures and context window implications that catch teams off guard in production
  • Skipping modality-specific evaluation: teams ship visual Q&A features without benchmarks and only discover failure modes after user complaints
  • Picking a single provider without testing latency and accuracy trade-offs across GPT-4o, Gemini, and Claude for the specific use case
  • Underestimating preprocessing complexity — raw images and audio almost always need normalisation, resizing, or chunking before model ingestion

When NOT to take this

This training is not the right fit for a team that has not yet shipped any LLM-based feature to production — they will struggle with the hands-on labs and would benefit more from a foundational LLM engineering workshop first.

Providers to consider

Sources

This training is part of a Data & AI catalog built for leaders serious about execution. Take the free diagnostic to see which trainings your team needs.