How mature is your Data & AI organization?Take the diagnostic
All trainings

AI TRAINING

AI for CTOs: Engineering Organisation Design

Leave with a concrete AI-augmented engineering strategy covering talent, tooling, and platform investment decisions.

Format
programme
Duration
20–32h
Level
practitioner
Group size
6–20
Price / participant
€4K–€7K
Group price
€25K–€55K
Audience
CTOs, VP Engineering, and Heads of Platform in mid-to-large technology-driven organisations
Prerequisites
Active engineering leadership role (CTO, VP Eng, or equivalent); familiarity with software development lifecycle and team management

What it covers

This practitioner-level programme equips CTOs and VP Engineering with the frameworks and decision-making tools to redesign their engineering organisations around AI capabilities. Participants evaluate developer productivity tooling, build AI platform investment theses, and define talent strategies that blend AI-native and traditional engineering roles. The format combines peer cohort sessions, case studies from scaled engineering orgs, and a capstone organisation design exercise. Participants leave with a board-ready roadmap for AI integration across their engineering function.

What you'll be able to do

  • Build a scored vendor evaluation matrix for AI developer tooling and present a justified buy/build/partner recommendation
  • Design an AI-augmented engineering org chart with defined team topologies, responsibilities, and headcount implications
  • Define a 12-month talent strategy that identifies roles to retrain, roles to hire, and roles impacted by AI automation
  • Construct a platform investment roadmap distinguishing foundational infrastructure from quick-win productivity tools
  • Produce a board-ready business case quantifying productivity gains, cost impacts, and risk factors of the proposed AI strategy

Topics covered

  • AI-assisted developer productivity: Copilot, Cursor, and beyond
  • Build vs. buy vs. partner: AI vendor stack evaluation frameworks
  • Platform engineering investments for AI workloads (MLOps, LLMOps)
  • Talent strategy: hiring, upskilling, and role redefinition in AI-augmented teams
  • Engineering org design models: platform teams, AI guilds, embedded AI squads
  • Measuring engineering effectiveness with AI tooling (DORA, SPACE metrics)
  • AI governance and security posture for engineering organisations
  • Budget modelling and board-level business cases for AI platform investment

Delivery

Delivered as a 4-week cohort programme with two 3-hour live virtual sessions per week, supplemented by async case study reading and a group capstone project. In-person intensive formats (2-day offsite) are available for executive leadership teams. Hands-on exercises account for approximately 50% of learning time. Participants receive a facilitated peer network of engineering leaders across non-competing industries. All materials, frameworks, and templates are provided digitally.

What makes it work

  • Executive sponsorship: CTO champions the AI engineering vision explicitly, rather than delegating to a single AI team
  • Pilot-then-scale discipline: one high-visibility team adopts AI tooling with defined success metrics before org-wide rollout
  • Role clarity: new AI-adjacent responsibilities (prompt engineers, AI platform engineers) are formally defined in job architecture
  • Regular feedback loops: quarterly engineering effectiveness reviews that tie AI tool adoption to DORA and SPACE metric trends

Common mistakes

  • Treating AI tooling adoption as a bottom-up engineering choice rather than a strategic org-design decision with budget and governance implications
  • Deploying AI developer tools without updating engineering metrics, leading to misleading productivity signals
  • Underestimating talent strategy change — assuming existing engineers will self-organise around new AI workflows without structured upskilling
  • Selecting AI infrastructure vendors based on technical demos alone, without evaluating data residency, compliance, and long-term TCO

When NOT to take this

This programme is not the right fit if the organisation has fewer than 10 engineers or has not yet shipped a production product — foundational engineering practices should be established before redesigning the org around AI augmentation.

Providers to consider

Sources

This training is part of a Data & AI catalog built for leaders serious about execution. Take the free diagnostic to see which trainings your team needs.