Engineering capacity against the objectives on the table
One list above your delivery tools: the initiatives, their score, their size, and the teams’ capacity. What does not hold shows before the committee.
Explore the demo workspace: the application itself, read-only, on a sample portfolio.
The tracker does not speak to the committee
Jira knows where every ticket stands. Nobody knows which of the thirty workstreams serves the strategy, or what gets stopped when capacity runs out.
The deck to rebuild every two weeks
Management wants a readable view. It arrives as slides rebuilt by hand, already wrong on the day of the meeting.
Technical debt missing from the trade-offs
Foundations lose against visible requests, because they have neither a score nor an objective. They come back as incidents.
A decision layer above delivery
Fygurs replaces neither Jira nor Linear. It holds the list of initiatives, their score and their objective, and leaves execution where it is.
Capacity next to the roadmap
Initiative size and team capacity in one place. Overloads show before anyone commits.
A score engineering can defend
Feasibility rated on criteria written in advance, with a confidence level. Technical debt goes into the calculation like everything else.
The portfolio lens
« Are we holding the trajectory we promised? »
- Initiatives by phase and by dependency, across every team
- Capacity and milestones in one place
- The gap between trajectory and commitment, week after week
See Fygurs on your roadmap
One hour, with your initiatives in flight. You leave with capacity next to them.