Your AI use cases in the same portfolio as everything else
Every use case with the product that carries it, the result expected from it, its compliance status, and the person who can stop it. Visible at any time, without rebuilding a slide before the committee.
Explore the demo workspace: the application itself, read-only, on a sample portfolio.
A governance framework, but no portfolio
The AI Office, the lifecycle and the risk grid exist. What does not exist is the up-to-date list of use cases, with their status and their value, anywhere other than a spreadsheet.
Compliance you can prove
The AI Act asks you to show who supervises what, use case by use case. A document does not prove it. A system does.
Use cases with no expected result
Forty lines in the backlog, with no ranking between what changes the business and what is technical curiosity. Nobody knows which ones to stop.
AI use cases as initiatives
Each use case enters the portfolio with its product, its objective, its size and its score. The same vocabulary as the product and IT teams.
Every signal, read in one place
Lifecycle, compliance, technical quality, value: four layers read in one place, and every signal tied to the objective it serves.
The committee, prepared from today’s data
What changed since the last session, the readings per objective, the decisions to take. What gets decided is written down and stays on record.
The data and AI leader’s lens
« Which use cases create value, which ones drift? »
- AI use cases by lifecycle phase, stuck or moving
- Drift, data quality and AI Act compliance in one place
- Value captured, against the objective each use case serves
See Fygurs on your use cases
One hour, with your current list. You leave with a first scored portfolio.